![]() ![]() ![]() What I'm sure about is that it did save the transparancy before any latest update(s). Maybe there's a bug in my krita-version? I'm not sure but I think I already tried to install it new. I'm really becoming desperate about spending so much time on this. When a given pixel is completely transparent on all layers, Krita will instead show a checkerboard pattern, like the rose image shown above. Icons 0 6 up 23 dec 10, kubuntu, round black and white illustration transparent background PNG clipart size: 256x256px filesize: 14.13KB Icons 0 6 up 23 dec 10, notepad++, green chameleon symbol transparent background PNG clipart size: 256x256px filesize: 34. Krita is the opposite: it doesn’t understand images that don’t track transparency, and will always add a transparency channel to images. the motive and the black-grey/empty background. Some older programs don’t always have transparency by default. Opened up again in krita it looks like it should. I want to use it in word where a copyright sign must be seen behind the motive of the image, but checked it in any other image-showing program I have, and it was everywhere like there. png-image in any other programm, there is the black all over where it should be transparent. Step 2: Next, go to the ‘ Bezier Curve Selection Tool ’ on the left sidebar of your screen. Go to the ‘Open File’ option and select an image from your desktop. And yes, yes, yes, I have enabled the "save alpa-ch."! That's why I have absolutlety no clue what's wrong :( If you don’t have this app on your PC, go to the official website and download it for free. And it does use the color chosen there to fill the transparent spaces, that's the problem! I changed the color in "image" ->"backgroundcolor." to test it, also changed it with disabled "save alpha-ch." and then enabled it again, and well, again it put the changed color there where it should be transparent. ![]() This will be best explained with some testing, but if the surrounding image has mostly small elements, like branches, a small patch size will give better results, while a big patch size will be better for images with big elements, so they get reused as a whole.I tried to change transparency color by disabling the "save alpha-ch." but there's is also no "no color" or anything, just a big palette of colors. This file is transparent PNG, Ive exported as icons of 32px/48px/64px. The idea is simply a squirrel with paint on its tail, as previously discussed in the community, but the color scheme I choose was the 'KDE blues'. Patch size determines how big the size of the pattern to choose is. Ive designed an icon for Krita and I think it can be considered as a mascot idea too. Higher accuracy will do many samples, making the algorithm run more often and give more precise results, but because it has to do more work, it is slower. A low accuracy will do few samples, but will also run the algorithm fewer times, making it faster. The smart patch tool has the following tool options: Accuracy ¶Īccuracy indicates how many samples, and thus how often the algorithm is run. You can see it as a smarter version of the clone brush. It does this by letting you draw the area which has the element you wish to remove, and then it will attempt to use patterns already existing in the image to fill the blank. The smart patch tool allows you to seamlessly remove elements from the image. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |